Sri Aurobindo's letters on Savitri - Part 6
Something more might need to be said in regard to the Overhead note in poetry and the Overmind aesthesis;
but these are exactly the subjects on which it is difficult to write with any precision or satisfy the intellect's
demand for clear and positive statement.
I do not know that it is possible for me to say why I regard one line or
passage as having the Overhead touch or the Overhead note while another misses it. When I said that in the lines about
the dying man1 the touch came in through some intense passion and sincerity in the writer, I was simply
mentioning the psychological door through which the thing came. I did not mean to suggest that such passion and sincerity
could of itself bring in the touch or that they constituted the Overhead note in the lines. I am afraid I have to say what
Arnold said about the grand style; it has to be felt and cannot be explained or accounted for. One has an intuitive
feeling, a recognition of something familiar to one's experience or one's deeper perception in the substance and the
rhythm or in one or the other which rings out and cannot be gainsaid. One might put forward a theory or a description
of what the Overhead character of the line consists in, but it is doubtful whether any such mentally constructed
definition could be always applicable. You speak, for instance, of the sense of the Infinite and the One which is
pervasive in the Overhead planes; that need not be explicitly there in the Overhead poetic expression or in the substance
of any given line: it can be expressed indeed by Overhead poetry as no other can express it, but this poetry can deal
with quite other things. I would certainly say that Shakespeare's lines
have the Overhead touch in the substance, the rhythm and the feeling; but Shakespeare is not giving us here the sense of the One and the Infinite. He is, as in the other lines of his which have this note, dealing as he always does with life, with vital emotions and reactions or the thoughts that spring out in the life-mind under the pressure of life. It is not any strict adhesion to a transcendental view of things that constitutes this kind of poetry, but something
1 See p. 747
2 Hamlet V.ii
page 809
behind not belonging to the mind or the vital and physical consciousness and with that a certain quality or power
in the language and the rhythm which helps to bring out that deeper something. If I had to select the line in
European poetry which most suggests an almost direct descent from the Overmind consciousness there might come
first Virgil's line about "the touch of tears in mortal things":
Another might be Shakespeare's
or again Milton's
We might also add Wordsworth's line
There are other lines ideative and more emotional or simply descriptive which might be added, such as Marlowe's
If we could extract and describe the quality and the subtle something that mark the language and rhythm and
feeling of these lines and underlie their substance we might attain hazardously to some mental understanding of the
nature of Overhead poetry.
The Overmind is not strictly a transcendental consciousness - that epithet would
more accurately apply to the supramental and to the Sachchidananda consciousness - though it looks up to the
transcendental and may receive something from it and though it does transcend the ordinary human mind and in
its full and native self-power, when it does not lean down and become part of mind, is
1 Aeneid, I.462
2 The Tempest I.ii
3 Paradise Lost II.148
4 Ode on the Initmations of Immortality, iii
5 Doctor Faustus V.i
page 810
superconscient to us. It is more properly a cosmic consciousness, even the very base of the cosmic as we perceive,
understand or feel it. It stands behind every particular in the cosmos and is the source of all our mental, vital or
physical actualities and possibilities which are diminished and degraded derivations and variations from it and have not,
except in certain formations and activities of genius and some intense self-exceeding, anything of the native Overmind
quality and power. Nevertheless, because it stands behind as if covered by a veil, something of it can break through
or shine through or even only dimly glimmer through and that brings the Overmind touch or note. We cannot get this
touch frequently unless we have torn the veil, made a gap in it or rent it largely away and seen the very face of
what is beyond, lived in the light of it or established some kind of constant intercourse. Or we can draw upon it from
time to time without ever ascending into it if we have established a line of communication between the higher and the
ordinary consciousness. What comes down may be very much diminished but it has something of that. The ordinary reader
of poetry who has not that experience will usually not be able to distinguish but would at the most feel that here is
something extraordinarily fine, profound, sublime or unusual, - or he might turn away from it as something too high-pitched
and excessive; he might even speak depreciatingly of "purple passages", rhetoric, exaggeration or excess. One who had the
line of communication open could on the other hand feel what is there and distinguish even if he could not adequately
characterise or describe it. The essential character is perhaps that there is something behind of which I have already
spoken and which comes not primarily from the mind or the vital emotion or the physical seeing but from the cosmic
self and its consciousness standing behind them all and things then tend to be seen not as the mind or heart or body
sees them but as this greater consciousness feels or sees or answers to them. In the direct Overmind transmission this
something behind is usually forced to the front or close to the front by a combination of words which carries the
suggestion of a deeper meaning or by the force of an image or, most of all, by an intonation and a rhythm which
carry up the depths in their wide wash or long march or mounting surge. Sometimes it is left lurking behind and
only suggested so that a subtle feeling of what is not actually expressed is needed if the reader is not to miss it.
This is oftenest the case when there is just a touch or note pressed upon
page 811
something that would be otherwise only of a mental, vital or physical poetic value and nothing of the body of the
Overhead power shows itself through the veil, but at most a tremor and vibration, a gleam or a glimpse. In
the lines I have chosen there is always an unusual quality in the rhythm, as prominently in Virgil's line,
often in the very building and constantly in the intonation and the association of the sounds which meet in the
line and find themselves linked together by a sort of inevitable felicity. There is also an inspired selection
or an unusual bringing together of words which has the power to force a deeper sense on the mind as in Virgil's
One can note that this line if translated straight into English would sound awkward and clumsy as would many of the finest lines in Rig Veda; that is precisely because they are new and felicitous turns in the original language, discoveries of an unexpected and absolute phrase; they defy translation. If you note the combination of words and sounds in Shakespeare's line
so arranged as to force on the mind and still more on the subtle nerves and sense the utter absoluteness of the difficulty and pain of living for the soul that has awakened to the misery of the world, you can see how this technique works. Here and elsewhere the very body and soul of the thing seen or felt come out into the open. The same dominant characteristic can be found in other lines which I have not cited, - in Leopardi's
or in Wordsworth's
1 Le Ricordanze, 71-72. Leopardi's original has one different word and is spread over parts of two lines:
page 812
Milton's line lives by its choice of the word "wander" to collocate with "through eternity"; if he had chosen any other word, it would no longer have been an Overhead line, even if the surface sense had been exactly the same. On the other hand, take Shelley's stanza -
This is perfect poetry with the most exquisite melody and beauty of wording and an unsurpassable poignancy of pathos, but there is no touch or note of the Overhead inspiration: it is the mind and the heart, the vital emotion, working at their highest pitch under the stress of a psychic inspiration. The rhythm is of the same character, a direct, straightforward, lucid and lucent movement welling out limpidly straight from the psychic source. The same characteristics are found in another short lyric of Shelley's which is perhaps the purest example of the psychic inspiration in English poetry:
We have again extreme poetic beauty there, but nothing of the Overhead note.
In the other lines I have cited
it is really the Overmind language and rhythm that have been to some extent transmitted; but of course all
Overhead poetry is not from the Overmind, more
1 The Prelude, III.63
2 To a Skylark
3 One word is too often profaned
page 813
often it comes from the Higher Thought, the Illumined Mind or the pure Intuition. This last is different
from the mental intuition which is frequent enough in poetry that does not transcend the mental level.
The language and rhythm from these other Overhead levels can be very different from that which is proper
to the Overmind; for the Overmind thinks in a mass; its thought, feeling, vision is high or deep or
wide or all these things together: to use the Vedic expression about fire, the divine messenger, it
goes vast on its way to bring the divine riches, and it has a corresponding language and rhythm. The
Higher Thought has a strong tread often with bare unsandalled feet and moves in a clear-cut light: a
divine power, measure, dignity is its most frequent character. The outflow of the Illumined Mind comes
in a flood brilliant with revealing words or a light of crowding images, sometimes surcharged with its
burden of revelations, sometimes with a luminous sweep. The Intuition is usually a lightning flash showing
up a single spot or plot of ground or scene with an entire and miraculous completeness of vision to the
surprised ecstasy of the inner eye; its rhythm has a decisive inevitable sound which leaves nothing essential
unheard, but very commonly is embodied in a single stroke. These, however, are only general or dominant
characters; any number of variations is possible. There are besides mingled inspirations, several levels
meeting and combining or modifying each other's notes, and an Overmind transmission can contain or
bring with it all the rest, but how much of this description will be to the ordinary reader of poetry at
all intelligible or clearly identifiable?
There are besides in mental poetry derivations or substitutes
for all these styles. Milton's "grand style" is such a substitute for the manner of the Higher Thought.
Take it anywhere at its ordinary level or in its higher elevation, there is always or almost always that echo there:
or
1 Paradise Lost I,1-2
2 ibid VII.26
or
Shakespeare's poetry coruscates with a play of the hues of imagination which we may regard as a mental substitute for the inspiration of the Illumined Mind and sometimes by aiming at an exalted note he links on to the illumined Overhead inspiration itself as in the lines I have more than once quoted:
But the rest of that passage falls away in spite of its high-pitched language and resonant rhythm far below the
Overhead strain. So it is easy for the mind to mistake and take the higher for the lower inspiration or
vice versa. Thus Milton's lines might at first sight be taken because of a certain depth of emotion in their
large lingering rhythm as having the Overhead complexion, but this rhythm loses something of its sovereign
right because there are no depths of sense behind it. It conveys nothing but the noble and dignified pathos of
the blindness and old age of a great personality fallen into evil days. Milton's architecture of thought and verse
is high and powerful and massive, but there are usually no subtle echoes there, no deep chambers : the occult
things in man's being are foreign to his intelligence, - for it is in the light of the poetic intelligence that
he works. He does not stray into "the mystic cavern of the heart", does not follow the inner fire entering like a
thief with the Cow of Light into the secrecy of secrecies. Shakespeare does sometimes get in as if by a
splendid psychic accident in spite of his preoccupation with the colours and shows of life.
I do not
know therefore whether I can speak with any certainty about the lines you quote; I would perhaps have to read
them in their context first, but it seems to me that there is just a touch, as in the lines about the dying man.
The thing that is described there may have happened often enough in times like those of the recent
1 ibid. III, 35-36
2 2 Henry IV, III i
page 815
wars and upheavals and in times of violent strife and persecution and catastrophe, but the greatness of the
experience does not come out or not wholly, because men feel with the mind and heart and not with the soul;
but here there is by some accident of wording and rhythm a suggestion of something behind, of the greatness
of the soul's experience and its courageous acceptance of the tragic, the final, the fatal—and its resistance;
it is only just a suggestion, but it is enough: the Overhead has touched and passed back to its heights.
There is something very different but of the same essential calibre in the line you quote:
It is still more difficult to say anything very tangible about the Overmind aesthesis. When I wrote about it
I was thinking of the static aesthesis that perceives and receives rather than of the dynamic aesthesis which
creates; I was not thinking at all of superior or inferior grades of poetic greatness or beauty. If the complete
Overmind power or even that of the lower Overhead planes could come down into the mind and entirely transform
its action, then no doubt there might be greater poetry written than any that man has yet achieved, just as a
greater superhuman life might be created if the Supermind could come down wholly into life and lift life wholly
into itself and transform it. But what happens at present is that something comes down and accepts to work under
the law of the mind and with a mixture of the mind and it must be judged by the laws and standards of the mind.
It brings in new tones, new colours, new elements, but it does not change radically as yet the stuff of the
consciousness with which we labour.
Whether it produces great poetry or not depends on the extent to
which it manifests its power and overrides rather than serves the mentality which it is helping. At present it
does not do that sufficien'tly to raise the work to the full greatness of the worker.
And then what do you
mean exactly by greatness in poetry ? One can say that Virgil is greater than Catullus and that many of Virgil's
lines are greater than anything Catullus ever achieved. But poetical perfection is not the same thing as
poetical greatness. Virgil is perfect at his best, but Catullus too is perfect at his best: even each has a
certain exquisiteness of perfection, each in his own kind. Virgil's kind is large and deep, that of Catullus sweet and
page 816
intense. Virgil's art reached or had from its beginning a greater and more constant ripeness than that of Catullus.
We can say then that Virgil was a greater poet and artist of word and rhythm but we cannot say that his poetry, at
his best, was more perfect poetry and that of Catullus less perfect. That renders futile many of the attempts at
comparison like Arnold's comparison of Wordsworth's Skylark with Shelley's. You may say that Milton was a greater
poet than Blake, but there can always be people, not aesthetically insensitive, who would prefer Blake's
lyrical work to Milton's grander achievement, and there are certainly things in Blake which touch deeper
chords than the massive hand of Milton could ever reach. So all poetic superiority is not summed up in the
word greatness. Each kind has its own best which escapes from comparison and stands apart in its own value.
Let us then leave for the present the question of poetic greatness or superiority aside and come back to the Overmind
aesthesis. By aesthesis is meant a reaction of the consciousness, mental and vital and even bodily, which receives a
certain element in things, something that can be called their taste, Rasa, which, passing through the mind or sense or
both, awakes a vital enjoyment of the taste, Bhoga, and this can again awaken us, awaken even the soul in us to something
yet deeper and more fundamental than mere pleasure and enjoyment, to some form of the spirit's delight of existence,
Ananda. Poetry, like all art, serves the seeking for these things, this aesthesis, this Rasa, Bhoga, Ananda;
it brings us a Rasa of word and sound but also of the idea and, through the idea, of the things expressed by the
word and sound and thought, a mental or vital or sometimes the spiritual image of their form, quality,
impact upon us or even, if the poet is strong enough, of their world-essence, their cosmic reality, the very
soul of them, the spirit that resides in them as it resides in all things. Poetry may do more than this, but this
at least it must do to however small an extent or it is not poetry. Aesthesis therefore is of the very essence of
poetry, as it is of all art. But it is not the sole element and aesthesis too is not confined to a reception of
poetry and art; it extends to everything, in the world: there is nothing we can sense, think or in any way
experience to which there cannot be an aesthetic reaction of our conscious being. Ordinarily, we suppose that
aesthesis is concerned with beauty, and that indeed is its most prominent concern: but it is concerned with
many other things also. It is the universal Ananda
page 817
that is the parent of aesthesis and the universal Ananda takes three major and original forms, beauty, love and
delight, the delight of all existence, the delight in things, in all things. Universal Ananda is the artist and
creator of the universe witnessing, experiencing and taking joy in its creation. In the lower consciousness it
creates its opposites, the sense of ugliness as well as the sense of beauty, hate and repulsion and dislike as
well as love and attraction and liking, grief and pain as well as joy and delight; and between these dualities or
as a grey tint in the background there is a general tone of neutrality and indifference born from the universal
insensibility into which the Ananda sinks in its dark negation in the Inconscicnt. All this is the sphere of
aesthesis, its dullest reaction is indifference, its highest is ecstasy. Ecstasy is a sign of a return towards
the original or supreme Ananda: that art or poetry is supreme which can bring us something of the supreme tone
of ecstasy. For as the consciousness sinks from the supreme levels through various degrees towards the Inconscience
the general sign of this descent is an always diminishing power of its intensity, intensity of being, intensity of
consciousness, intensity offeree, intensity of the delight in things and the delight of existence. So too as we
ascend towards the supreme level, these intensities increase. As we climb beyond Mind, higher and wider values
replace the values of our limited mind, life and bodily consciousness. Aesthesis shares in this intensification of
capacity. The capacity for pleasure and pain, for liking and disliking is comparatively poor on the level of our
mind and life; our capacity for ecstasy is brief and limited; these tones arise from a general ground of neutrality
which is always dragging them back towards itself. As it enters the Overhead planes the ordinary aesthesis turns
into a pure delight and becomes capable of a high, a large or a deep abiding ecstasy. The ground is no longer
a general neutrality, but a pure spiritual ease and happiness upon which the special tones of the aesthetic
consciousness come out or from which they arise. This is the first fundamental change.
Another change
in this transition is a turn towards universality in place of the isolations, the conflicting generalities,
the mutually opposing dualities of the lower consciousness. In the Overmind we have a first firm foundation
of the experience of a universal beauty, a universal love, a universal delight. These things can come on
the mental and vital plane even before those planes are directly touched or influenced by the spiritual
consciousness; but they are there
page 818
a temporary experience and not permanent or they are limited in their field and do not touch the whole being.
They are a glimpse and not a change of vision or a change of nature. The artist for instance can look at
things only plain or shabby or ugly or even repulsive to the ordinary sense and see in them and bring out
of them beauty and the delight that goes with beauty. But this is a sort of special grace for the artistic
consciousness and is limited within the field of his art. In the Overhead consciousness, especially in the
Overmind, these things become more and more the law of the vision and the law of the nature. Wherever the
Overmind spiritual man turns he sees a universal beauty touching and uplifting all things, expressing itself
through them, moulding them into a field or objects of its divine aesthesis; a universal love goes out from
him to all beings; he feels the Bliss which has created the worlds and upholds them and all that is expresses
to him the universal delight, is made of it, is a manifestation of it and moulded into its image.
This universal aesthesis of beauty and delight does not ignore or fail to understand the differences
and oppositions, the gradations, the harmony and disharmony obvious to the ordinary consciousness; but,
first of all, it draws a Rasa from them and with that comes the enjoyment, Bhoga, and the touch or the mass of
the Ananda. It sees that all things have their meaning, their value, their deeper or total significance which
the mind does not see, for the mind is only concerned with a surface vision, surface contacts and its own surface
reactions. When something expresses perfectly what it was meant to express, the completeness brings with it a
sense of harmony, a sense of artistic perfection; it gives even to what is discordant a place in a system of
cosmic concordances and the discords become part of a vast harmony, and wherever there is harmony, there is a
sense of beauty. Even in form itself, apart from the significance, the Overmind consciousness sees the object
with a totality which changes its effect on the percipient even while it remains the same thing. It sees
lines and masses and an underlying design which the physical eye does not see and which escapes even the
keenest mental vision. Every form becomes beautiful to it in a deeper and larger sense of beauty than that
commonly known to us. The Overmind looks also straight at and into the soul of each thing and not only at its
form or its significance to the mind or to the life; this brings to it not only the true truth of the thing
but the delight of it. It sees also the one spirit in all, the face of the Divine everywhere
page 819
and there can be no greater Ananda than that; it feels oneness with all, sympathy, love, the bliss of the
Brahman. In a highest, a most integral experience it sees all things as if made of existence, consciousness,
power, bliss, every atom of them charged with and constituted of Sachchidananda. In all this the Overmind
aesthesis takes its share and gives its response; for these things come not merely as an idea in the mind or
a truth-seeing but as an experience of the whole being and a total response is not only possible but above a
certain level imperative.
I have said that aesthesis responds not only to what we call beauty and beautiful
things but to all things. We make a distinction between truth and beauty; but there can be an aesthetic response
to truth also, a joy in its beauty, a love created by its charm, a rapture in the finding, a passion in the embrace,
an aesthetic joy in its expression, a satisfaction of love in the giving of it to others. Truth is not merely a dry
statement of facts or ideas to or by the intellect; it can be a splendid discovery, a rapturous revelation, a thing
of beauty that is a joy for ever. The poet also can be a seeker and lover of truth as well as a seeker and
lover of beauty. He can feel a poetic and aesthetic joy in the expression of the true as well as in the
expression of the beautiful. He does not make a mere intellectual or philosophical statement of the truth;
it is his vision of its beauty, its power, his thrilled reception of it, his joy in it that he tries to convey
by an utmost perfection in word and rhythm. If he has the passion, then even a philosophical statement of it he
can surcharge with this sense of power, force, light, beauty. On certain levels of the Overmind, where the mind
element predominates over the element of gnosis, the distinction between truth and beauty is still valid. It is
indeed one of the chief functions of the Overmind to separate the main powers of the consciousness and give to
each its full separate development and satisfaction, bring out its utmost potency and meaning, its own soul and
significant body and take it on its own way as far as it can go. It can take up each power of man and give it its
full potentiality, its highest characteristic development. It can give to intellect its austerest intellectuality
and to logic its most sheer unsparing logicality. It can give to beauty its most splendid passion of luminous form
and the consciousness that receives it a supreme height and depth of ecstasy. It can create a sheer and pure poetry
impossible for the intellect to sound to its depths or wholly grasp, much less to
page 820
mentalise and analyse. It is the function of Overmind to give to every possibility its full potential, its own
separate kingdom. But also there is another action of Overmind which sees and thinks and creates in masses, which
reunites separated things, which reconciles opposites. On that level truth and beauty not only become constant
companions but become one, involved in each other, inseparable: on that level the true is always beautiful and
the beautiful is always true. Their highest fusion perhaps only takes place in the Supermind; but Overmind on its
summits draws enough of the supramental light to see what the Supermind sees and do what the Supermind does though
in a lower key and with a less absolute truth and power. On an inferior level Overmind may use the language of
the intellect to convey as far as that language can do it its own greater meaning and message but on its summits
Overmind uses its own native language and gives to its truths their own supreme utterance, and no intellectual
speech, no mentalised poetry can equal or even come near to that power and beauty. Here your intellectual dictum
that poetry lives by its aesthetic quality alone and has no need of truth or that truth must depend upon aesthetics
to become poetic at all, has no longer any meaning. For there truth itself is highest poetry and has only to appear
to be utterly beautiful to the vision, the hearing, the sensibility of the soul. There dwells and from there springs
the mystery of the inevitable word, the supreme immortal rhythm, the absolute significance and the absolute utterance.
I hope you do not feel crushed under this avalanche of metaphysical psychology; you have called it upon yourself by your
questioning about the Overmind's greater, larger and deeper aesthesis. What I have written is indeed very scanty and
sketchy, only some of the few essential things that have to be said; but without it I could not try to give you any
glimpse of the meaning of my phrase. This greater aesthesis is inseparable from the greater truth, it is deeper because
of the depth of that truth, larger by all its immense largeness. I do not expect the reader of poetry to come anywhere
near to all that, he could not without being a Yogi or at least a sadhak: but just as the Overhead poetry brings some
touch of a deeper power of vision and creation into the mind without belonging itself wholly to the higher reaches,
so also the full appreciation of all its burden needs at least some touch of a deeper response of the mind and some
touch of a deeper aesthesis. Until that becomes
page 821
general the Overhead or at least the Overmind is not going to do more than to touch here and there, as it did in the
past, a few lines, a few passages, or perhaps as things advance, a little more, nor is it likely to pour into our
utterance its own complete power and absolute value.
I have said that Overhead poetry is not necessarily
greater or more perfect than any other kind of poetry. But perhaps a subtle qualification may be made to this
statement. It is true that each kind of poetical writing can reach a highest or perfect perfection in its own line
and in its own quality and what can be more perfect than a perfect perfection or can we say that one kind of absolute
perfection is "greater" than another kind? What can be more absolute than the absolute? But then what do we mean by the
perfection of poetry? There is the perfection of the language and there is the perfection of the word-music and the rhythm,
beauty of speech and beauty of sound, but there is also the quality of the thing said which counts for something.
If we consider only word and sound and what in themselves they evoke, we arrive at the application of the theory
of art for art's sake to poetry. On that ground we might say that a lyric of Anacreon is as good poetry and as perfect
poetry as anything in Aeschylus or Sophocles or Homer. The question of the elevation or depth or intrinsic beauty
of the thing said cannot then enter into our consideration of poetry; and yet it does enter, with most of us at any
rate, and is part of the aesthetic reaction even in the most "aesthetic" of critics and readers. From this point of
view the elevation from which the inspiration comes may after all matter, provided the one who receives it is a fit
and powerful instrument; for a great poet will do more with a lower level of the origin of inspiration than a smaller
poet can do even when helped from the highest sources. In a certain sense all genius comes from Overhead; for genius
is the entry or inrush of a greater consciousness into the mind or a possession of the mind by a greater power.
Every operation of genius has at its back or infused within it an intuition, a revelation, an inspiration, an
illumination or at the least a hint or touch or influx from some greater power or level of conscious being
than those which men ordinarily possess or use. But this power has two ways of acting: in one it touches
the ordinary modes of mind and deepens, heightens, intensifies or exquisitely refines their action but
without changing its modes or transforming its normal character; in the other it brings down into
page 823
these normal modes something of itself, something supernormal, something which one at once feels to be
extraordinary and suggestive of a superhuman level. These two ways of action when working in poetry
may produce things equally exquisite and beautiful, but the word "greater" may perhaps be applied, with
the necessary qualifications, to the second way and its too rare poetic creation.
The great bulk of
the highest poetry belongs to the first of these two orders. In the second order there are again two or
perhaps three levels; sometimes a felicitous turn or an unusual force of language or a deeper note of
feeling brings in the Overhead touch. More often it is the power of the rhythm that lifts up language that
is simple and common or a feeling or idea that has often been expressed and awakes something which is not
ordinarily there. If one listens with the mind only or from the vital centre only, one may have a wondering
admiration for the skill and beauty of woven word and sound or be struck by the happy way or the power with
which the feeling or idea is expressed. But there is something more in it than that; it is this that a deeper,
more inward strand of the consciousness has seen and is speaking, and if we listen more profoundly we can get
something more than the admiration and delight of the mind or Housman's thrill of the solar plexus. We can feel
perhaps the Spirit of the universe lending its own depth to our mortal speech or listening from behind to some
expression of itself, listening perhaps to its memories of
or feeling and hearing, it may be said, the vast oceanic stillness and the cry of the cuckoo
or it may enter again into Vyasa's
1 Wordsworth, The Solitary Reaper
2 ibid
page 823
or remember its call to the soul of man,
There is a second level on which the poetry draws into itself a fuller language of intuitive inspiration,
illumination or the higher thinking and feeling. A very rich or great poetry may then emerge and many of
the most powerful passages in Shakespeare, Virgil or Lucretius or the Mahabharata and Ramayana, not to
speak of the Gita, the Upanishads or the Rig Veda, have this inspiration. It is a poetry "thick inlaid
with patines of bright gold" or welling up in a stream of passion, beauty and force. But sometimes there
comes down a supreme voice, the Overmind voice and the Overmind music and it is to be observed that the
lines and passages where that happens rank among the greatest and most admired in all poetic literature.
It would be therefore too much to say that the Overhead inspiration cannot bring in a greatness into
poetry which could surpass the other levels of inspiration, greater even from the purely aesthetic point
of view and certainly greater in the power of its substance.
A conscious attempt to write Overhead
poetry with a mind aware of the planes from which this inspiration comes and seeking always to ascend to
those levels or bring down something from them, would probably result in a partial success; at its lowest
it might attain to what I have called the first order, ordinarily it would achieve the two lower levels of
the second order and in its supreme moments it might in lines and in sustained passages achieve the
supreme level, something of the highest summit of its potency. But its greatest work will be to express
adequately and constantly what is now only occasionally and inadequately some kind of utterance of the
things above, the things beyond, the things behind the apparent world and its external or superficial
happenings and phenomena. It would not only bring in the occult in its larger and deeper ranges but the
truths of the spiritual heights, the spiritual
1 Mahabharata, Vana parva, 64.1.
2 Bhagavadgita 9.33.
page 824
depths, the spiritual intimacies and vastnesses as also the truths of the inner mind, the inner life, an inner or subtle physical beauty and reality. It would bring in the concreteness, the authentic image, the inmost soul of identity and the heart of meaning of these things, so that it could never lack in beauty. If this could be achieved by one possessed, if not of a supreme, still of a sufficiently high and wide poetic genius, something new could be added to the domain of poetry and there would be no danger of the power of poetry beginning to fade, to fall into decadence, to fail us. It might even enter into the domain of the infinite and inexhaustible, catch some word of the Ineffable, show us revealing images which bring us near to the Reality that is secret in us and in all, of which the Upanishad speaks,
The gods of the Overhead planes can do much to bridge that distance and to bring out that closeness, even if they cannot altogether overtake the Reality that exceeds and transcends them.
1 Isha Upanishad 5
page 825